Eighty per cent of the world’s copper sits locked in chalcopyrite — a sulphide ore so stubborn that conventional mining writes it off as uneconomic. Meanwhile, billions of tonnes of tailings oxidise in waste ponds, leaching toxins into groundwater. The metals we desperately need for the energy transition are either trapped in rock we can’t process or already extracted and dumped as pollution.
This is the extractive paradigm at its endgame: diminishing returns, mounting environmental liabilities, and a supply crisis disguised as geology. But what if the problem isn’t scarcity — it’s chemistry?
We have the solutions, now, and you’re only just starting to hear about regenerative mining, which is going to become a cornerstone to the resources sector in the years ahead.
Orivium’s technology doesn’t mine in the traditional sense. It applies a mild electrical current to commonly available reagents, generating radicals that dissolve copper at ambient temperature. This means no furnaces. No sulphuric acid baths. No passivation layers that render the copper inaccessible.
In trials at the University of Sydney, this electrochemical approach extracted copper from chalcopyrite thirteen times faster than acid leaching, achieving over 90% recovery in 48 hours using a catalytic electrode. The secret is radical chemistry: reactive oxygen species break Cu–S and Fe–S bonds cleanly, without the sulphur layer that normally armours the mineral surface and stops conventional methods cold.
The process can be enhanced further with ultrasound and UV light, which improve mass transfer and create homogeneous radical species throughout the liquid medium. This solves metallurgy’s oldest frustration — the passivation problem that has kept chalcopyrite economically out of reach for decades. In Orivium’s system, the reagents are recyclable, water is reused in a closed loop, and energy consumption is low enough to pair directly with solar or wind power.
Think of it as having the same impact in terms of resource extraction as fracking, only it’s green. Instead of cracking rock with pressure and chemicals, you’re cracking molecular bonds with electrons and water. Waste tailings are further remediated. The energy input can be renewable electricity. And the by-product isn’t methane but rather hydrogen.
Traditional mining treats tailings as a write-off: a compliance cost, an environmental liability, a problem for regulators to manage. Regenerative mining sees them as an above-ground ore body — pre-mined, pre-crushed, and sitting at zero extraction cost. The economics flip from liability to asset.
Consider the scale: globally, mining operations have generated over 200 billion tonnes of tailings. Even at modest recovery rates, that represents trillions of dollars in stranded metal value. Where smelters require billion-dollar capital investment and fifteen-year payback periods, Orivium’s modular reactors can be deployed at tailings sites for a fraction of the cost. The process runs on renewable power, produces tradeable hydrogen as a by-product, and turns remediation obligations into revenue streams.
Every tonne of waste reprocessed is land reclaimed, water detoxified, and metal recovered. From Chile’s Chinchorro disaster to Queensland’s Mount Morgan, governments are facing billion-dollar clean-up liabilities with no clear path to funding. Technologies that can both remediate and generate income are both politically attractive and fiscally inevitable.
By 2075, PwC forecasts that the amount of metals in global ‘circulation’ will mitigate the need for large-scale mining. But we can’t wait fifty years for that equilibrium to arrive naturally — not with electrification accelerating, battery demand doubling every five years, and mineral supply already constrained.
Regenerative mining is the bridge technology. It recovers metals from the backlog of mining and industrial waste, buying time for recycling infrastructure to mature. It decouples supply growth from new environmental damage. And it changes the industry’s mandate: mines no longer extract until exhausted of what’s easy to process and abandon. Instead, they process, recover, restore, and repeat.
This is abundance through efficiency, not expansion. When 80% of copper reserves become economically accessible overnight, and when every tailings dam becomes a potential refinery, scarcity stops being a materials problem and becomes a logistics problem. The bottleneck shifts from geology to deployment. Prices stabilise. Supply chains diversify. Electrification scales without the environmental guilt.
The EU Critical Raw Materials Act and Australia’s Critical Minerals Strategy both prioritise low-emission extraction and circular supply chains. Carbon border adjustments are coming. Investors are pricing in environmental risk. Social licence is no longer optional.
In this environment, regenerative mining isn’t a corporate virtue signal but rather a genuine case of competitive positioning. Companies that can demonstrate negative environmental impact (land restored, water saved, carbon avoided) will access cheaper capital, faster permits, and more stable community relations. Those that can’t will face escalating compliance costs and stranded assets.
The technology exists. The economics work. The regulatory winds are favourable. What remains is deployment, and the recognition that mining’s future isn’t about digging deeper, but processing smarter. Orivium’s electrochemical approach represents more than incremental improvement; it’s a paradigm shift from depletion to circulation, from extraction to regeneration, from environmental debt to environmental repair.
Discover more stories, breakthroughs and expert perspectives on resource innovation and sustainability.
